Although the recent attack on social activist Swami Agnivesh is being widely and strongly condemned, there are many people who, citing some earlier incidents involving Swami ji, perceive the attack as an inevitable and normal culmination. This is definitely most unfortunate. Those who do not agree with his earlier or present views and actions were, and are, absolutely free and within their rights to disagree. They are also not wrong in trying to oppose him in a democratic manner. However, before doing so, they could possibly take a moment to look at the background of Swami Agnivesh.

Distressed by the continuous violent attacks by Sangh Brigade’s ‘Hindutva lumpen’ elements, some people are calling for organising a united movement of the Dalits, other backward classes (OBCs), Adivasis and the minorities, in order to teach the Hindutva groups a fitting lesson. Such sentiment is also present in their response to the recent incident of the attack on Swami Agnivesh. Some friends are confident that if the Dalits, OBCs, Adivasis and minorities unite and come together, the Hindutva brigade will have to look for escape routes. One such friend recently went to the extent of claiming on the social media that the only lesson that can be taught to the lynchers would be to lynch them in the same manner. The Hindutva of the RSS and the pride associated with it is born out of the frustration of an insecure and defeated mindset. That is why it is forever cursed to remain a negative voice. However, seeking to teach a lesson to these Hindutva lumpen elements through a unity of the Dalits, OBCs, Adivasis and minorities is not a positive option. It is actually nothing more than a short-lived, temporary and immature indignation.

My first submission in this context is that the Dalits, OBCs and Adivasis are presently not too far distanced from the RSS/BJP; the RSS/BJP has succeeded in winning over large sections of them, and this solidarity is continuing well. The RSS/BJP’s integration with neo-liberalism/neo-imperialism has become full-fledged and complete; the Dalits, OBCs and Adivasis have been supportive of these policies of the RSS/BJP. As far as the minority Muslims are concerned, how long will they remain in alienation and oppose the RSS/BJP? After all, they are also Indians, like the rest of the citizens. Apart from their religious identity, they too need some kind of support in terms of political power. In any case, a Muslim knows well that he cannot even think of thrashing the Hindutva lumpen elements. In case he dares to do so, even the Dalits, OBCs and Adivasis will teach him a lesson! It is also well known that the RSS is working hard to influence the Shia Muslim community in the country. It cannot be denied that the RSS work’s consistently and eventually delivers results, even though they may take time in coming. It is its patient work of many decades that has brought us to this juncture when all streams of scientific, progressive and revolutionary thought are being bashed and beaten up by the RSS!

My second submission is that if the intellectuals of this country are planning to unite the Dalits, OBCs, Adivasis and minorities to teach a lesson to the Hindutva lumpen elements, then, we have to remember Lohia’s more democratic suggestion—‘Live communities do not wait for five years’. In order that identity discourse and politics are not co-opted by right-wing forces, Lohia gave a formula for unity between the Dalits, OBCs, adivasis, women and minorities, based on social justice. Behind this was his dream of building a new Indian civilisation which would create its special place in the modern world. In his plan, this largest part of India’s population has been, more or less, non-conformist, that is, freed from the clutches of the pre-colonial Brahminical order and the colonial capitalist ideology. By building solidarity with these marginalised groups, it is possible to democratically win political power and establish a new system of equality, different from Brahminism and capitalism, a new socialism which can be an example before the whole world. Lohia had a great dream to integrate this marginalised yet non-conformist mind-bank of India for the building up of socialism vis a-vis capitalism and communism. In order to proceed in this direction, he gave the principle of special opportunity (reservation). However, today, this formula of Lohia is being used by the so-called champions of social justice only for capturing power in order to implement neoliberal policies. The RSS/BJP too has used the same tactics, imitating the other leaders and parties.

If intellectuals in this country are suggesting that the solidarity of these marginalised groups should be directed towards teaching a lesson to the Hindutva lumpen elements, then, it can only be called a backward step, even within the limited frame of vote-bank politics. The corporate capitalist forces are not only making the country’s leaders dance to their tunes, but also the intellectuals. Let me remind here that the intellectuals who call for the unity of the Dalits, OBCs, Adivasis and minorities to teach a lesson to the Hindutva lumpen elements, had also joined the ‘crowd’ in support of the anti-reservationist group of Anna Hazare and Arvind Kejriwal!

Nearly all news channels ran a live telecast of not only Pranab Mukherjee addressing the swayamsevaks of the RSS but also the speech of Mohan Bhagwat, the sar sanghchalak, or supremo, of the RSS which came just before. A nondescript RSS function became a national event and the message of the Sangh reached all corners of India thanks to our curiosity over what India’s former president was going to do there.

Picture perfect for the RSS. It got not only one, but many frames which it will showcase to future generations to prove that it is not shunned by the civilised: Pranab Mukherjee standing on the balcony of the birth place of Hedgewar, the founder of the RSS; Mukherjee garlanding his statue; Mukherjee’s remarks in the visiting book: “I came here to pay my respects to a great son of India.”

As Mukherjee was providing the RSS these photo-ops, I flipped through Pathey, a pocket-sized book full of the gems of Hedgewar Thought which swaymsevaks are supposed to carry around. The Telegraph has reproduced some of them for our benefit, to enlighten us about the greatness of the mind of this son of India:

• The Sangh wants to put in reality the words “Hindusthan of Hindus”. Hindusthan is a country of Hindus. Like other nations of other people (eg Germany of Germans), this is a nation of Hindu people.
• Only a piece of land cannot be called ‘Nation’. A nation is created where people of one thought, one culture and one tradition live together since ancient times. Because of exactly the above reasons, ‘Hindusthan’ is the name given to our country and this is a country of the Hindus.
• Expecting help from others and pleading for it is a clear sign of weakness. This clearly reflects in behavior. So, Sangh swayamsewaks should fearlessly proclaim, “Hindusthan of Hindus”. Remove all narrow-mindedness. We do not say that others should not live here. But they should be aware that they are living in Hindusthan of Hindus. (Like others would realise, if they were living there, that they are living in France of French people, or Germany of Germans, or Spain of Spanish people). Others cannot infringe on rights of Hindus here.
• Seeing the Saffron Flag (Bhagwa Dhwaj), the entire history of the nation along with its tradition and culture comes before our eyes. The mind rises and special motivation comes in it. Only this Saffron Flag (Bhagwa Dhwaj) we consider as our Guru, as a symbol of our Tatva, i.e. principle. Sangh has regarded the most sacred Bhagwa Dhwaj as the Guru instead of any particular individual.

The same Hedgewar had called Muslims “Yavana snakes”, who should be seen with suspicion for their reluctance to pay homage to mother India.

Every word of his contradicts the idea of India that Gandhi, Nehru, Patel, Rajagopalachari, Azad and Sarojini Naidu shaped through their struggles, and he built the RSS to dismantle the edifice of secular India that Mukherjee eulogised in his speech.

If Hedgewar is great, then the very notion of greatness would need to be revised or upturned. Would any sensible German politician call an anti-Semitic ideologue a great son of Germany?

Apart from these, the picture of Mukherji himself standing at attention to watch the saffron flag go up and the parade of the lathi-wielding swayamsevaks would be taken around as trophies by the RSS.

The spokespersons of the RSS lost no time in telling the world that the speeches of Bhagwat and Mukherjee complimented each other. They did in many ways, even if the Congress party and the commentariat is applauding Mukherjee for his great, statesmanlike address.

Bhagwat used the cover of unity in diversity to camouflage his real message that Hindus are specially responsible (uttardayi) for India. And Mukherjee, while dwelling at length about the great ancient period of India and its unbroken history of 5,000 years, wrapped up the crucial medieval period in just two sentences. To tell an audience of swayamsevaks that “Muslim invaders” came and ruled India for 600 years, after which the East India Company captured India, is to endorse their wrong-headed, communal reading of history in which they speak of “800 years of foreign rule”.

What Mukherjee chose not to say

The whole event was high in symbolism. Mukherjee obliged the RSS by not embarrassing it by putting a mirror to the Sangh. We may be pardoned for calling him Gandhian but his speech showed that he lacks the courage of Gandhi. Gandhi did not mince words when he told the leaders of the Sangh of his unhappiness at learning they were involved in anti-Muslim violence, or when he forced Golwalkar to say that the RSS did not believe in violence against minorities. Of course, Golwalkar, like a true Sanghi, never meant it.

No one expected Pranab babu to be as forthright as Patel, who slammed Golwalkar for the obstinacy of the RSS and its refusal to mend its ideology of violence against the minorities. Mukherjee used diplomatese, but he was not honest. He said “violence” when he should have said murder and lynching. He said “at the heart of violence is darkness” when he should have said that at the core of violence is the anti-Muslim and anti-Christian hatred spread by the RSS and its affiliates. He should have talked about lumpen crowds taking over India and the goondaism that is being practised in the name of nationalism. Instead, Mukherjee gave a sanctimonious speech which —as a friend from Gujarat, Prasad Chako, rightly said—“would fit any audience anywhere, a speech which anyone could interpret in any manner”.

Mukherjee only flattered his hosts when he said that India was the fastest growing economy. He complained about India being very low on the happiness index. But he did not care to identify the unhappy lot or the sources of their unhappiness. Otherwise, he could have talked about the farmers who are dying and battling against a murderous economic regime, he could have talked about the youth which feels unwanted in this great land, he could have mentioned Dalits, who are being attacked everywhere, and of course Muslims and Christians who are at the target of the government and the RSS. He preferred not to do that. That could have struck a discordant note on a solemn occasion like this.

Since people love positivity, Mukherjee could have talked about the humanity that people like Yashpal Saxena of Delhi and Imam Rashidi of Asansol, who lost their sons to the communal frenzy that the RSS and its affiliates have unleashed on the people of this country. Or, the sadhus of Ayodhya who held an iftar for their Muslim neighbours in their temples, or the heroic strivings of the citizens of Gurgaon who are battling the demon of divisiveness by bringing Hindus closer to Muslims. He did not remember them. He could have. He decided not to.

By pitching himself above the divides which are tearing apart the lives of ordinary Indians, @CitiznMukherjee, as he calls himself on Twitter, shied away from the duties of a true citizen. Citizenship is cultivated by standing together with those who are being denied the rights attendant on citizenship.

What the ‘great son’s’ message really is

Bhagwat, so lovingly and reverentially addressed as sarsangha chalakji by Mukherjee, anticipated the impact of the event when he said that after it was over, the Sangh would remain the Sangh and Pranab Mukherjee would remain Pranab Mukherjee.

Bhagwat was right. Just when the nation was preparing for the passing out parade of the swayamsevaks at Nagpur, one of them, their senior, Basanagouda Patil Yatnal, a BJP MLA from Karnataka, was heard instructing corporators not to work for Muslims.

“I am telling you corporators, don’t work for the welfare for Muslims. You must work for the welfare of Hindus only. Who voted us to power? I told my staff, no one wearing skull caps or burqas should visit my office,” the Indian Express reported Yatnal telling his party workers.

Yatnal is only following the “great son of India”, Hedgewar, and his maatr sanstha, the RSS. Before he is called fringe, let us remind ourselves that he has served as a minister in the government of the darling of Indian democrats, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, a proud swayamsevak.
Nice words fail to gloss over the viciousness of the mind that lurks behind them.